Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve Rupe
As I have stated before my primary source of information is C-Span. I prefer to believe my own lieing eyes and ears and do my own analysis than rely upon the spin and bias of every media outlet in existence.
|
So when would the subject of how much money Elizabeth Warren pays her staff EVER come up on CSPAN?
Answer: It wouldn't.
But I do agree with you on preferring to hear what people actually say coming out of their own mouths instead of reporters bias on it.
HOWEVER...this is the kind of subject that Elizabeth Warren probably wouldn't be commenting on or proving or disproving.
And reading that Huffington Post article that supposedly says Warren pays women "More" than men...you find out real quick that it's bullshit.
The article says that Mindy Myers salary wasn't included in the "average" because she had only worked there for one quarter of the fiscal year and makes $170,000 a year in salary (how that kind of salary can be paid to just ONE person on a U.S. Senator's staff is beyond me...a U.S. senators salary is $174,470 a year. And somehow she has a staff member who gets $170,000 lol)
The Huffington Post uses Myers big ass salary as the way to change the "average" and "disprove" the original story.
SO....if you take away the relatively new hiring of just ONE woman...Mindy Myers who is the head of everything and just use the salaries of the actual "worker-level" people on her staff who have been there for YEARS...then guess what?
She pays the men MORE than the women.
That my friend is called analyzing information.
