Quote:
Originally Posted by Relentless
Incidentally... anyone who was sending to a very high paying offer and wont send to it anymore because you believe its possible that very high payout is after a few sales were shaved
|
with all due respect you're replacing sarettah's scenario with your own here. his opening post had to do with
proof of unethical action, acting in a deceitful manner incongruent with the promise made/terms presented to to affiliates when they joined the program
not drama llama supposition as to 'shave'
I figured you'd weigh in here as it's clear from past threads this is a topic about which you have passionate opinions. which is cool, the metrics you bring to the topic are super-helpful when parsing value amongst sponsors
genuinely curious as to your thought process in posing the following:
you run a service which has as one of its standards of inclusion:
"
The product or service must be provided in useful, complete and working condition up to the quality standards promised as part of the tour, sales pitch or marketing materials."
meaning honesty in biz practice and not fucking around with people. following through on terms presented.
why should affs or anyone else on the b2b side of things expect or tolerate a different, lower standard?
genuine bafflement without a point to prove as aff stuff is small portion of my overall income so don't have a significant stake in the debate.
just don't understand why anyone would want to associate with peeps comfortable with dishonest practice just cuz they make you money. like they'd be any less likely to fuck over you massively if they could rationalize it? or their website clients?
Angelou stated it best: "
When someone shows you who they are believe them; the first time"
enjoying reading everyone's POV's, do honestly see some merit in each perspective. just for the bottom-line-above-all'ers don yo flea collars =)