Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbie
And yet the Federal LAW was called "The Wiretap Act" And was updated in 1986 as the "Electronic Communications Privacy Act"
Here ya go, educate yourself and stop believing what the biased Democrat "reporters" on CNN are telling you:
Wiretap Act - Lawyers.com
https://it.ojp.gov/PrivacyLiberty/au.../statutes/1285
Ignorance on a subject means that maybe you stop posting and start learning about things. You're better than this. |
You're not very smart, cute, but not smart.
What do you see here Robbie?
Trump tweeted his PHONES were wiretapped by Obama and that Obama was bad or sick because Obama did that.
Trump lied.
And look at all the time and Jo's people are wasting because of his causation. Look how much time you've spent defending a lie. Trump sucks & doesn't give a shit about a n y o n e
OH! Also if you had actually READ your second link your see that in the FIRST paragraph it advises readers that the Patriot act overrides everything below and refers readers to this link
USA PATRIOT Act if you read all the changes to the act etc you'll see it's legal to unmask Americans if doing so gives pertinent information to assessing a FOREIGN AGENT THREAT it was stipulated in the 2006 ammendmant and extension to the
Patriot Act here
Section 7 P (2)
(2) pertain to a foreign power or agent, are relevant to the activities of a suspected foreign agent,
or pertain to an individual in contact with such an agent. Directs the judge to enter an ex parte order approving the release of records or tangible things if the judge finds that the statement of facts in the application establishes reasonable grounds to believe that items sought are relevant and pertinent.
BAM! You lose this round baby dick
