Quote:
Originally Posted by TheSquealer
Fuckwit,
When a US Citizen is involved in the conversation, they must immediately stop the surveillance in the absence of a warrant. You know, like they failed to do with Flynn - the recording of which was illegal and then they released the conversation, which again was 100% illegal.
But yeah, nothing to see here..... dipshit.
|
You're lying again.
Eavesdropping on Flynn was the legal, obvious intelligence move | TheHill
"While different minimization procedures apply depending on the legal authority under which the government conducted the surveillance, as a general matter, the procedures require that a U.S. person?s name be redacted and replaced with ?(U.S. Person)? to protect that individual?s privacy.
However, an exception to that rule is if the U.S. person?s name is necessary to understand the foreign intelligence information or assess its importance. Flynn?s identity was essential to understanding why his conversation with Kislyak was important."