Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbie
Yep, the govt. shouldn't rule over you and tell you what you can and can't do.
And your prudish opinions shouldn't be allowed to rule other people's lives.
You don't like narcotics? Don't take them.
You like to do a bump of coke on the weekend with a few drinks? That's YOUR business.
THAT is my perspective.
I'm not your daddy and you're not a child. And the govt. isn't your daddy either.
Grown people should be able to do as they please unless they hurt someone or steal from someone.
|
My perspective is that junkies COST to society. Meaning EVERYONE pays for their treatment, for their inability to work and so on and on. Not to mention some addicts actually steal or hurt in order to get the dose.
That are the reasons to prohibit it.
Same logic - some people say that safety belts should not be enforced as it is HIS/HER own life. Do you agree with that?
I do not because losing those lives actually COST to society (one less person to contribute etc etc). That is why they are enforced, even though it is his/her own life...