Quote:
Originally Posted by AtlantisCash
thats why i say we can'T call libertarian/free market to be anarchist and which we shouldn't, utopias mostly cause distopic results, our ideals on libertarianism should based on realistic arguements, privatisation and no any sort of government intervention on concentual and economical/property rights etc and the final point suppose to be a stateless society after right conditions been performed.
aditionally, you may want to check this out for what i was refering of anarchist communism ; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarchist_communism |
ahhh now i got you "anarchist communism" is a form of communism what adapted the anarchic part - yes.
what i meant is that the word "free" and "market" do not really fit together because a market has no moral and thatīs why the market should be ruled somehow.
we have seen in 2007/2008 where the financial secor went because it was not ruled.
even the rules obama gave them where not enough but better than nothing.
now trump kicks this rules and as you arleady see in the stockmarket the game already begins again. it is already completely overheated and this is dangerous.
look in example the amazon shares - sure it is a big company but the PER is actually 113 - that means the price for this share calculates actual profits extrapolated on the next 113 years. do you think that ordinary people who buy that share are informed what that means? financial markets are so highly complicated that they MUST be ruled - especially because their money source are ordinary people who can loose all they have.
to eliminate this already small protection is similar to the reintroduction of freebooting.