View Single Post
Old 02-08-2017, 08:20 PM  
crockett
in a van by the river
 
crockett's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 76,806
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbie View Post
I was curious how we could actually "Vet" people for 2 whole years.

It sounds pretty intense...like some kind of 2 year never-ending class they have to attend or something.

So I started looking it up because it doesn't make any sense to me.
Do they get interrogated? Investigated? Background checks?

And if so...why would it ever take 2 YEARS to do something like that?

Well...it turns out that "no" none of those things are done according to refugees who made it to the U.S. recently.

Our govt. simply forces them to stay in refugee camps for 2 years before "vetting" them.

That's fucked up.

A family living in an Egyptian refugee camp was interviewed 5 different times in a process that lasted about 4 hours (after being there for 2 years).
They were asked "yes" and "no" questions like: ?Are you a member or representative of a terrorist organization?"

The men were asked extra questions about their time in service in the Syrian Army (It's mandatory for ALL men in Syria to serve a stint in the Army there).

Anyway, I just thought it was interesting.
The govt. makes it sound like it's a 2 year investigation into each refugee.
Nope.

Whether it's enough to keep ISIS or Al Queda from coming in with the refugees (as they claim they will)...I don't know.
Neither does the Federal Govt.
The FBI says it's not possible to truly know.

And Hillary stated in an email that it was "impossible".

So in my opinion...we need a better way of "vetting" them to know who they are. And it needs to be sped up. 2 years is a nightmare for the 99.99% of refugees who are really looking to escape a living hell.

We need a system that truly vets them and does so quickly.

The current system is a joke.
As usual, Robbie doesn't even comment on the actual topic of impeachment, but goes on a tangent about one little thing someone said trying to distract and dis-rail the topic.

He never changes..

Robbie of course will not comment on the fact the President of the US is "RIGHT NOW" in "VIOLATION" of the US Constitution because he failed to distance himself from his business empire. He even said he would, he promised the American people he would do this, but he didn't he was just lying to us "AGAIN"..

"... no person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under [the United States], shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office or Title of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince or foreign State.?

It's all ok though because of course Robbie thinks it's ok to pick and choose which parts of the Constitution "really" matter and which parts we can just ignore..
crockett is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote