View Single Post
Old 02-02-2017, 12:16 AM  
mobstriker
Confirmed User
 
mobstriker's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 189
MyFreeCams design: old school VS web2.0?

Hi.
I work with crakrevenue long time.
Today I thought about myfreecams design.
I don't like it, honestly to say.
I think it could be more clean.
Something like chaturbate or runetki.

I started write this post to open discussion that they need modern web2.0 design, etc.
But after that I checked the engagement using similarweb.com
I saw that "old school" design does not affect the engagement. Vice Versa.
Modern desing has less pages per visit (livejasmin is winner with their web2.0)

December,2016

Code:
                    Livejasmin* Chaturbate MyFreeCams  Bongacams   Flirt4Free  Imlive   Runetki   Streamate  Cams.com
Total Visits        497.50M     195.60M    64.80M      132.90M     85.60M      22M      15.50M    5.30M      4M
Avg. Visit Duration 00:00:43    00:14:41   00:09:00    00:05:19    00:02:41    00:03:41 00:03:28  00:08:36   00:04:44
Pages per Visit     1.25        13.52      7.10        5.75        1.91        2.47     3.90      8.93       6.17
Bounce Rate         84.80%      24.29%     40.07%      42.38%      73.19%      40.55%   63.44%    69.95%     44.44%
* Measured by Google Analytics
Site owner has connected their Google Analytics account.



What is you favourite cam site design? (As for me, I like design on streamate, runetki)
Do you think, that design is important or not?
What do you think about myfreecams design?
mobstriker is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote