Quote:
Originally Posted by VRPdommy
Well, I don't discriminate, I hate everyone. I blame everyone.
And I am curious if you are actually suggesting that a verifiable agreement not to make weapons grade nuclear material is better than not having any agreement at all ?
I fail to see the logic in that but perhaps you can explain that to me without just pointing a finger at someone else.
I will say that all of those that spend more time blaming others have created the mess we are in by not addressing what we need in the present and making a case for the future, not the past.
That is what I think that agreement did since the coalition for sanctions was falling apart from the commercial (big money) interest to do business with them again. Soon, there would have been no sanctions and no agreement.
Focus you energy where it can make a difference, in the present, otherwise, look in the mirror the next time you want to point a finger
|
verifiable? i guess you read a different agreement than I did. the one i read gave Iran all the power to choose the inspectors that verify. wow what a fair arbitrator of the agreement.
yeah i would say no agreement is better than a fraud agreement that Iran has already broken. But hopefully they will only make a dirty bomb with the material, not the full monty.
but you trust people that chant "death to america" every friday prayer group with nuclear materials. how liberal of you.
