Quote:
Originally Posted by CarlosTheGaucho
Back in the day when actual journalism existed, to call somebody a "sexual predator" based on a bunch of unfounded allegations would get her sacked in a minute. Based on what used to be called the journalist codex.
Why don't they call HRC a lying, massively corrupt borderline criminal with a history of terrible decisions and covering them alike?
Isn't that worth reporting about?
Nobody could ever question that based on the actual evidence.
It's all out there in Wikileaks directly from DNC's mouth.
https://twitter.com/wikileaks |
Yet it's OK to claim Hillary committed treason or Obama was a Muslim not born in the US.. Funny how people only care about shit when it's aginst their team or affects them.. Meanwhile it's all ok when done to others.