Quote:
Originally posted by nike
Mmmm... Should have been more clear, I mean 'content' text as in the meta (hidden terms of search engines) on the page. I was amused / bored by the rabid hypocrisy of a lot of adult webmasters.
|
Boring to you - but they did shut down SexEducation.com for awhile.
What I learned from GFY and even from this ACACIA thing is "risk management" ...
Stick to the primary issues - and to me that's sexual equality.
It's from the lack of that that most peversions stem from.
Quote:
|
I used the archive to check your front page over the years - seemed clear that you were against CP from the start.
|
Of course like any father would be (well I guess most eh).
Quote:
|
I then used the archive to check a current major sponsor of GFY, Clubseventeens was banner running at the top of the page, they're meta text from similar periods clearly was designed to attract CP traffic - Lolita was the most used term, second only to teen.
|
I have often wondered if I had pushed the limits more (I did sometimes) in the old days more - if it would have made more money or less - which would come in handy today.
My attitude is - the key to the information age is information.
I just didn't realize how hard it was to find "real" sexual information. It's not so easy from the "biased" or "flowery" or other books...
The book that influenced me the most was ...
"Ever since Adam and Eve - The evolution of human sexuality."
By Malcom Potts and Roger Short
Cambridge University Press
Quote:
|
(We can argue about how people should interpret the term Lolita, but in my opinion in the years 98-2000 it was definitely a term associated with underage models, to be honest now I think it is a much more broad term - which is why Visas rules are so fucking half-assed.)
|
Not really in agreement with that.
Quote:
|
I don't particularly support or dislike you, as I say I find your e-mail address repellant, but also I am not some freak who thinks kids should not learn about major human areas until some arbitrary age decided by a country I am not a citizen of.
|
After 20,000 members and many years as you know ... it is only recently in this newsgroup that the handle "Dad@" has become an issue. And I wasn't going to change it ... but as a result of your post - I am rethinking - my rethinking... again ... it's only in this community they find it "repellant" ...
It's just that it has been MY email address for years ...
And it clearly shows I am NOT a Doctor - which I think is very important.
My attitude was - develop a "brand" - a "writer" that could replace me - actually. There are many Fathers that know their "stuff".
Anyways thanx for the clarification.
I did