Hey Eddy, long time no speak hope you are well mate
Serious question, do you, or does anyone else, actually KNOW the nuances of the conversation? eg, some rock star is talking to a buddy about how women who go to his concerts are so starstruck that if he wants, he can just go up and start kissing them? Grab their pussy? And they actually *let* him? Like he can't believe this shit, right? I mean who the fuck would allow that? But they do, so he says fuck this is great, and does it.
Would that be a guy who can't believe his insane good luck, and puts it in a very base way to a fellow guy who is a friend, most likely exagerrating for either comic or brovado effect... or would it be an actual sexist, misogynist, who goes around sexually assaulting women in all situations in his life?
Do you KNOW this for sure? If it was a guy you liked, would you be more inclined to go with the above? If it was a guy you didn't like, would you be more inclined to go with the above?
It may well be that Trump is in fact the type of guy who is jimmy savile. Or he could be cliff richard who make no mistake fucked a hell of a lot of his groupies, and is certainly no angel (he comes from my town and fucked just about every one of my older mates' sisters lol), yet with opportunity comes allegations?
I wouldn't stand here and say absolutely Trump is an innocent party, but I sure as fuck wouldn't take it as fact that he is, because some media who dislike him in the first place present it in a way to put him in the worst possible light for a multitude of reasons, not least of which is viewers/clicks/profit. Being there and truly understanding the nuances is crucial, as proven by the horseshit about Hillary 'laughing' about 'getting a child rapist off the hook'.
Hope you see what I'm getting at