Quote:
Originally posted by theking
Reuters not only falsely attributed the story to Deanna Wrenn but "hyped the story" with all of the extraneous negative comments. This is the way I view it...if you or someone else views it differently...so be it.
|
Doesn't matter if Rueters attributed it to Deanna Wrenn or Leanna Fenn when I read a reuter story I think it's simply a "Reuters" story not of some Lynn, Finn or Wrenn. Now, if the story was left alone it actually would be very biased towards U.S. gov and one of its many successful prop (atleast as most outside U.S. say it is). Changing the lines make it all so much more "unbiased" and interesting and guess what still giving credit to the original writer who prolly didn't even deserve it.. only seem someone name Wrenn thriving for some attention now instead?
Quote:
|
Shit.. not surprised Reuters revamped the story - the Wrenn version is slop for the brain dead - not exactly "news".
|
Couldn't agree more webby
