Quote:
Originally posted by Webby
theking:
Is that "objective reporting"??? Think not! It is a rambling collection of "words" by a writer more suited to pulp romance novels. Any editor is going to pull that garbage apart.
This was a "non event".
|
Her editor didn't. The story was run the way she reported it in her paper. Reuters asked her if they could run her story...she agreed and then did not run her story but a story written by their writers...but instead of taking credit for a slanted article they laid the blame at Deanna Wrenn's feet...thus making their story a total fabrication of the truth...and even refused to remove her name from the story...when she asked them to.