Quick question: shouldn't designers be judged SOLELY on how well their designs convert? It may look like shit or totally unimaginative crap....but at the end of the day, conversion beats "pretty" every time.
Quote:
Originally posted by AlienQ
"I will take a subscription site tour for an example of "Standardised" since it is seemingly overly standardised in my opinion to a point of hysteria. I believe the way of 5 page presentation hallmark tours are over. Its 80's porn style with crops fades and textures must end. I believe your selling the content not "Shock and Awe" of perfect symetry and colors IE " Graphical Cosmetics"."
Thats the part AMP dont like.
He depends on to much filters in his deisgns.
So I expected a smart easy reply on his part to the ring of "Wrong" without much thought to what I described above.
It is an afront to most designers since designers these days sell how well they look and not how good the content is.
|