Quote:
Originally Posted by Barry-xlovecam
Life will be pretty grim for the displaced masses who can only offer low skilled labor -- but that is not my fault; - Why should I be assessed more taxes to pay for the inequity?
- People with lesser skills need more money so I should be taxed to pay for them.
- This new underclass does not want to learn (or have the ability to learn) the needed job skills
- So, I should work hard with my hard learned skills to pay for their inabilities or unwillingness?
That is a fool's argument -- no wonder they can't make it. |
fact of the matter is that most homo sapiens are low skilled workers...capable of nothing else but being low skilled workers...take away their low skilled jobs and you also take away a substantial part of the skilled workers market...
uber will make money with the driverles taxis, but the millions that will be out of work spend money on some companies products where some high skilled worker works and buys your cam shows with the money he earns...uber driverless will cost YOU money, make no mistake about this...
those millions of drivers that will be out of a job would buy millions of shirts, cars, toys, lawnmowers, hairdryers, bagels, coffees, laptops, cellphones ect...those sales will be no more...on the other hand the guys at uber and their shareholders will not buy millions of cars, shirts ect but will probably buy much much less...
there is no scenario where this does not cost the high skilled workers still with jobs...low skill workers are much of the high skilled workers market...
the war against human jobs is being fought on 3 fronts at the same time:
-amazon and wallmart vs all small shops and affiliates
-robot workers and autopilot vehicles
-AI as a service