Quote:
Originally Posted by DVTimes
You stated it was not clear.
Thus anyone reading it would read it that I have a court orders against me.
How else would they read it.
So I want proof.
He is clearly telling lies, so why are you defending someone who is clearly telling lies?
Are you a moron?
|
It is not clear. That does not mean I admitted anything. It was initially insinuated you had a court order against you. Nat apologised for making this assumption.
The post you quoted about multiple court orders does not categorically say you have multiple court orders against you. That part is clear.
In your own response you say "...a court orders..." you cannot have "a court orders". It is either "a court order" or "court orders", which do you mean?