I have to ask - what's with all the
and 'good find' stuff that appears in these threads? If the lawyers representing homegrown et al don't already know all this very basic stuff then they are in the shit anyway. I can understand how very obscure prior art stuff may be of use but not most of the stuff posted that people seem to think is the best thing since sliced bread - it should be common knowledge to anyone lawyer involved in this case (not aimed at the guy who started the thread)