Quote:
Originally Posted by crockett
Justified by who? Other cops on internal review board and city paid prosecutors..
The only way to solve this issue, is to have a non biased review if every police involved shooting by a mix of police and civilians of their community.
Of course other cops don't find their fellow men in blue guilty of wrongdoing..
|
Usually all shootings are investigated by a state review board along officer's dept. and the state attorney's office. So you want citizens to review shootings and police procedure when they have no idea what hell goes on? Imagine with some of the dumb remarks you've made, having you on the review board. You'd have your head up your ass and wouldn't know what to do.
They've tried civilian review boards at police depts before. It didn't work out and was costing tax payers thousands of dollars for no reason. The people had the city's employment manual and rules and regulations regarding police procedural reviews. They broke the rules, unfairly targeted certain cops based on their own agendas and ended city had pay the officers money because they broke guidelines. So basically getting ex judges, retired cops, lawyers and regular Joe off the street did well... It all came to cop hating 101.
And years of bad shoots? Come with the statistics. Also come with the statistics of black on black, black on white, white on black, white on white, Hispanic on white, and white on Hispanic crimes. And see who wins. Out of respect for the boys in blue. You're out of touch.