Quote:
Originally posted by OzMedia
Rednecks mutilate animal parts, rednecks also resort to abuse to try to argue their case.
Fortunately where I live this kind of mutilation is illegal, as it should be.
You cannot compare the removal of an umbilical chord (some species chew them off their young) to the deliberate mutilation of an animal for your own aesthetic purposes.
There is no reason that an animals tail or ear needs to be mutilated other than for the purposes of appearance.
To go on arguing for the mutilation of animals is to demonstrate the cruel and abhorrent attitude you have towards other species.
|
Yes, you should get a clue as to the history behind ear cropping, tail docking and dew claw clipping.
Ear cropping, tail docking and dewclaw removal originated as means to prevent injuries. Hundreds of years ago dog owners removed those parts of puppies' ears and tails that were likely to be snagged or torn while hunting and working. Dewclaws (rudimentary 5th toes on the inside of dog's ankles) were removed for the same reason. Dogs that were bred for fighting or guarding had their ears and tails removed to prevent loose appendages from becoming convenient grips for their opponent's teeth.
Today, the practice of altering tails and ears is primarily a matter of continuing a tradition rather than fulfilling a need. Considered cosmetic surgery, these operations are elective and should only be performed after careful consideration.