View Single Post
Old 07-25-2003, 09:17 PM  
KRL
Entrepreneur
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 31,429
The whole premise of this case was could a registrar be held liable for damages cohen caused Gary by the registrar not affording his domain i.e. property proper protection.

NSI's legal position was domains are not property therefore we can not be held liable for our careless fuckups.

The court held domains are property and a registrar can be held liable if they fuckup your property. They cited the valet case. When you hand your keys to a valet to park your car regardless of whether it is a leased car or a owned car, you have the legal protection and expectation that the valet at that point is responsible for protecting your property.
__________________
If you would like to develop your domains, you can lease inexpensive foreign labor
from the leaders in the field at iWebmasters.com TO LOWER YOUR COSTS AND INCREASE YOUR PRODUCTION!

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***
Domains Adult News KRL's Newsletter Biz Tips Just Listed Domains
KRL is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote