Quote:
Originally Posted by mineistaken
I was always fascinated by GFYers who claimed something like this. You know who you are, props to you if you come out and admit being wrong.
Anyway, here is the debunking:
Four Problems With the 'Winnowing' Theory of Trump's Downfall - Bloomberg Politics
Main points:
1. 65% is not that far from Rubio's 67%. Cruz has 71%, also nothing staggering compared to how those "Trump only has 30%" types tried to depict
2. Trump has even more 65vs59 than Romney had. And Romney did not lose general election in a trashing way like some of the libbies tried to depict would happen in case of Trump vs Hilary. Again - you know who you are, props if you come here admitting you were wrong.
Additional point: Trump maybe more attractive to some left leaning voters than Romney was.
And just a thought - do you think lots of republicans would vote democrats instead of Trump in general election or something just because they did not like Trump. Nope, they would still vote republican, even if they did not like the guy that much. |
for the Record, Marley 2016!
in all seriousness to your original question, as soon as I read he would run, I thought to my self, fuck, this could work?
I was ridiculed when I mentioned it to my peers, and I quote "no fucking way" to which I smiled and went back to the original thought running through my brain.....fucker has a chance?
Fast forward and please note, I have no dog in the fight except to watch the people kill each other from the side lines, and low an behold! This fucker may just take the whitehouse and paint it white again!
Gawd Bless America!
#whitehousesmatter