Quote:
Originally Posted by Barry-xlovecam
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2383
And your 2nd Amendment right to bear arms is revoked for life too? 
They have no political or social objectives the just want to use force to; "in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof"
Seizing the BLM property forcibly is not ''domestic terrorism". However, the insurrectionists are in open rebellion of the US government, the US Federal Courts, US policy and US laws. They took federal property in protest of US Court sentences given out to 2 ranchers that burnt federal lands.
https://reason.com/blog/2016/01/04/r...nspired-oregon
Domestic terrorism might be car bombing federal buildings or similar.
|
Amusingly the apologists for the file sharing / tube / content theft industry went to great lengths to argue that the unauthorised use of someones hard work was not actually a crime, nor was it theft, nor were the abusers of said content actually thieves.
Its only "fair use" or "copyright infringement" at worst went the argument, and indeed the argument holds water given the lack of political will to prosecute offenders, and the lack of a coherant international law against such blatant abuse.
For some reason the apologists would argue tooth and nail that "theft" was somehow far worse than "copyright infringement" pages and pages of forum drivel. Walls of text.
For some reason the description of the "offence" made the apologists feel so much better.
Funny that.