Quote:
Originally Posted by x_hammer_x
The matter is it's my guess about "low resolution". I don't know. In fact I see pretty clear scan of ID with the only problem - a bit dirty. That's all.
You're right about 2015 and technologies. The scan is OK but they considered it like "fake" with no comments.
|
I have a phone with a low resolution camera. Apart from that the printer/scanner/copier, stills camera, video camera produce great images. And none are the latest models. A webcam studio that can't produce a good image of IDs, raise huge flags.
And all of these great scans can be faked in Photoshop.
In 2015, if I was MFC or any company not with the girls under direct management, the girl would have to go on Skype with her ID and do a live interview/check. The financial penalties for getting it wrong are too huge to take a risk.
ps
I come from a time before digital when our producers content, were instantly rejected if the IDs weren't next to the girls face, crystal clear and readable. When no one knew until after the film was processed. And yet we all managed to get over the hurdle. I wonder why some have a problem these days.