Quote:
Originally Posted by Rochard
You are comparing apples and oranges.
The United States shot down an Iranian airliner. This is accepted as fact, and no one is denying it. With the plane in Ukraine, the only people that could have shot down the plane was either the Russians or the Russian backed rebels. The ONLY people flying planes in the area was the Ukrainian military, and the Ukrainian military wouldn't be shooting down planes when they are the only ones flying them.
I understand you are Russian, and you are determined to defend the honor of your country, but you pick the dumbest points to argue about and try to defend nonsense. The Russian military is doing rather well in Syria, and it's surprising the military analysts in the Western world. Perhaps you should bring that up instead of the silly debating points you try to argue.
|
God man you watch too much CNN!
The war in Ukraine is between Ukrainian rebells and government forces. It's funny to hear Ukrainian politics saying there are russian army fighting against them )) Ukraning army doesn't even have money to buy camouflage or to give food to their soldiers. There are two great armies in the world - Russian and American. No chances Ukrainian army to be close to those big ones. And no chance it could resist more than 2 days against one of them.
Ukraine already shot down civilian plane back in 2001. They also had their jets in the air in that area at that day. So your fact breaks in peaces.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siberi...es_Flight_1812
There wasn't any evidence of rebels using BUK missile tank before. And the theory about russians had given BUK to rebels and taken it back right after the plane was hit pretty weird.
please spend 5 mins and read this:
Who Is Committed to Fully Investigate the MH17 Tragedy? The Almaz-Antey Investigation vs. the Dutch Safety Board | Global Research - Centre for Research on Globalization
at least you'll get independent point of view.