Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Markham
Was that before or after the attack?
Knowing after that it was a terrorist attack is like knowing 9/11 was a terrorist attack as the planes were hitting the twin towers. Was there info that 9/11 was likely, was that information delivered to Bush or people in his office?
Did he know there were WMDs in Iraq or did he think there was and waste 100,000s of lives, spend $billions and so unbalance the region the US/UK are still fighting there today?
Hillary is a subject of a witch hunt, George gets a free pass.
|
"george getting a free pass" has nothing to do with anything. it doesn't make sense to exclaim you can't investigate this because 15 years ago you didn't investigate that.
and the before/after the attack has nothing to do with this part of the investigation, which revealed Clinton lied to the American people about the attack. And she lied about knowing it was a terrorist attack in order to politicize it and downplay it in an election year for BO.
and she also withheld information from congress, who 8 days after the attack asked for ALL communications from her. it took her 3+ years to provide that, perhaps this investigation wouldn't have cost $4 million if Hills was not a disingenuous entrenched career politician. but she is and this investigation proves that. she's not fit to be president of the American people.