Quote:
Originally Posted by dyna mo
It also doesn't mean the Constitution needs to be altered either.
Of course it doesn't mean any weapon, that and such things like nuclear weapons have already been clarified by the supreme Court over the years.
And not everyone thinks gun ownership is about protection from tyranny, etc. In fact, I'd say most all gin owners own guns for reasons other than that.
|
I am not saying every one is one boat or the other. There is no need for assault weapons that can inflict mass casualties. Period.
I ask you again, where do you draw the line? At what point in the level of items that pose a danger to society, do you say no? Don't hide behind a Supreme Court decision to try and make a point. I am not literally trying to insult 'you' personally, and this shouldn't be a left or right issue. There is a reason we have laws, and this is exactly the type of situation where we all need to take a step back and re-examine these laws, not to deny anyone of their Constitutional rights, but to use some common sense. People also have the Constitutional right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. You can't be happy if your dead.