Originally Posted by dyna mo

You know what, it actually is simple, I misspoke earlier. remove the government authorization from the marriage contract.
This isn't about her religious freedom, what motivated her to be in contempt is beside the point. What's at issue here is the sc opinion that same sex marriage is legal by law in all 50 states.

The solution then is to instead of bringing IN same-sex marriage to government authorizing and okaying personal relationships and certifying that, take OUT the government from that contract between 2 adults.

Quakers do it that way in Pennsylvania, self confirmed marriage and the libertarian party also disagrees with government intervention in personal choice of relationships.