Quote:
Originally Posted by Shap
Mickey! Hate the name to be honest. It's a little generic and a little sterile and someone forgettable.
The idea is pretty sweet. Checking out the mia malkova one now. Great idea but i think the layout and way you sell and present it needs work.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shap
Sorry Mickey that was shitty feedback. This thread took a weird turn and I'm not sure what to make of it lol. I expected smaller guys to post pages they needed feedback on. But as someone else said the second I said actionable they checked out. Now it's big boys like you, Stan and Roald. While I'd love to give feedback I get the feeling the things the three of you are doing are so much bigger than just a single page or single design element that it's a bigger conversation.
|
Shap,
You started this, now own it, crush it!
He's watching, judging (and recording) you.
Jokes aside, thanks for the preliminary feedback and I don't think what you gave was shitty. Sometimes all it takes is a few ideas or morsels that other ideas can stem from or pointing out areas that need work.
RE: Brand - Agreed, we can definitely do better and have a plan in place to address that.
RE: Layout - We're rolling out a handful of new tours that should address a good portion of that. So any input on that will
definitely be considered.
About the thread, the turn it took and giving feedback on larger projects, I think you have a lot of options to stay sane, a few ideas:
- Limit feedback to
X number of specific areas of focus that you think will have the
biggest impact/will yield the biggest improvement.
That way you won't feel overwhelmed, there's no analysis paralysis, doesn't take as long and the site owner gets to focus on what will potentially have the biggest impact.
OR
- Ask the site owners to get more specific about what they want feedback on
OR
- Exclude paysites (the worst suggestion of them all)
I'm sure others will have ideas to add to that, so that they can help you help them and everyone wins.
Great initiative, rock on.