Quote:
Originally Posted by DanS
Yes.
But sites won't just give out that permission to webmasters like that, for the reasons Barry and me mentioned above.
And:
Even on CB, there are few girls who are very business minded.
Girls who are on like 12h daily, they play new games with the viewers every time you see them, new costumes all the time, etc...
If you really need custom promo content, just approach them, explain them their advantages or what to expect. Maybe they are business. Maybe not.
Still better than secretly taking records of auntie judie stuffing her 1970 dildo into her without permission.
I mean, come on. If you just take stuff from performers, you are breaking the rules, not them, yet you complain about them being stupid for not letting you.
Privacy is a big issue for a lot of them.
Even if the shows are public. There simply is a huge difference of having your broadcast for a few thousand viewers, and having your stuff all over the net.
And believe me, for every "legit" CB promo, there are a hundred cases where the performers get completely ripped off. No wonder they go berserk if they see your ads flying their content.
The performer I know, is selling her videos via the CB bio.
But she is hosting them off CB. Biggest concern here was that CB stripped off audio and the compression level of CB videos are terrible. But hosting it off site certainly helps as well with the copyrights, after reviewing the performers agreement.
Still, there are 90 minute videos hitting the tubes of her taking it in the ass getting thousands of views. No references to the CB room what so ever.
All I am saying is, that I understand where this is coming from.
And yes, there are lots of clueless tools on camsites, where you wonder how they managed how they turned on their PC or to connect a webcam. And it is absolutely in the nature of the game.
|
what does this have to do with what the OP asked though? Legit affiliates, with clearly marked, and easily spottable/clickable links to CB?
It's like Lisa Ann sending DMCAs to every webmaster who uses her watermarked pics/videos to send to the site she shot that scene for. Just because most camgirls are too dumb to realise that, doesn't make it the fault of legit webmasters who have sought and gained approval from the sponsor/camsite. I think the point is we can all understand that the camgirls don't understand how that works, and sympathise that some people rip off their work (just like with any other adult site), but they are actually hitting legit webmasters with repeated DMCAs which can harm their totally legit business, because:
a) they don't know any better
b) think they are being 'ripped off' somehow
c) have the absurd notion they can shove a cucumber in their asshole on a free streaming platform, and think that nobody else on the internet will ever get to see it
I guess if you don't know, then you don't know, so is it the camgirls' fault, or the camsites'... A decent shooter will make sure a newcomer knows the scope of how far her content will reach, and what a model release actually is. Maybe the cam companies are so keen to get new performers that that info is deliberately fuzzied (though I'm just playing devil's advocate here tbh).
..and Barry, please... 'they don't need you'
that may be true for less than 1% of girls who know how to generate and drive their own traffic, but that's a pretty strange thing to say.
The OP isn't about pirates and thieves, that plague every form of digital delivery there is, but about legit webmasters using approved content dealing with dumbfuck DMCA's that are baseless.