Quote:
Originally Posted by MrBottomTooth
It's fine they had to do that to get him. But they should have to pay for it. Instead of using seized funds to purchase new assault rifles or armored vehicles they should have funds set aside to help pay for rare instances like this.
|
The homeowner's insurance should cover it. The tenant should have had renters insurance, tough luck for his personal stuff.
(Renters ins is almost free and covers fire, theft and electronic/laptops if stolen from your car. Auto insurance doesn't)
I would rather have a big check to rebuild an aging rental home than the alternative .... Which very well could have been having someone shot dead in the house. Try renting it then or selling it.
.