View Single Post
Old 05-21-2015, 02:07 AM  
Johny Traffic
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 5,461
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matyko View Post
Do you feel/know this is a mandatory?
Anyone ever said 'no' to this?

I was just browsing through their channels and it seems all sponsors let YouPorn over-watermark their content or they over-watermark their own content they upload there.

Some paysites have mixed content though, some with untouched and some with the YouPorn watermark.

[I know this is trend can be seen on PornHub and this 'tube family' as well]

As far as I can think about it this has benefits only for the tubes:

1) unique content
2) if content gets scraped they still have their name on it
3) SEO [?]
4) watermark traffic

On content owner side this means extra work [unless you let them do the watermarking their way..] and harms branding.

This is something I really dislike and need explanation to understand why so many accepting these 'rules'. I would rather bump the revshare/pps of the tubes than this..

Any other aspects are very welcome, let's discuss!
You have been here for 10 years, made 6,000 posts and you really can't work this out?
__________________


hosted flv's, hosted galleries, morphing rss feeds, free content, free sites, hosted blog
Johny Traffic is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote