Quote:
Originally Posted by **********
Did you know that your favourite news channel, Fox News is already releasing passages from the book, before the book itself was released? I wonder why?
|
Just like Tony, you come off as a moron, when you resort to unhinged, nonfactual statements. Could the book be wrong? Sure it could. But it also could be smoke to the fire. Most people will not have the ability to know for themselves until May 5th. Until then we must rely on the 3 news outlets that made an exclusive deal to read and get the facts early. Those being 2 of your left wing newspapers the Washington Post and NY Times, in addition to your boogeyman fox.
New York Times, Washington Post, Fox News strike deals for anti-Clinton research - POLITICO.com
Quote:
|
Its author, Peter Schweizer, is a former speech-writing consultant to George W. Bush who's written for conservative media, but the Times says his tone is neutral and the book is meticulously researched.
|
New Book Said to Detail Shady Clinton Donations -- NYMag
You going all nuts would be the same as someone on the right screaming up and down that something bad about Jeb Bush is completely untrue because Karl Rove said it was made up by a left wing hack. As a rationale person, I toss out Rove's bias as just that, and wait to see what is presented, then decide if there is fire or even smoke there.