Originally Posted by ITraffic

plus i am talking about posting legitimate papers, from legitimate scientists from legitimate schools refuting the paper in the original post.

Originally Posted by dyna mo

i'll do even better, here's the study's lead author/scientist admitted they fudged the data

realclimate.org, that's good enough for you, right.

"Thus, the 20th century portion of our paleotemperature stack is not statistically robust, cannot be considered representative of global temperature changes, and therefore is not the basis of any of our conclusions." - See more at: RealClimate: Response by Marcott et al.