Quote:
Originally Posted by dyna mo
gfyers are railing on whp for spreading bullshit disinformation, regardless of any papers having been claimed read and more importantly, understood.
|
Fair enough...
But what peer reviewed science journals would you consider worthy of following in terms of scientific debate of any given hypothesis?
Unfortunately, when vast research grant money is used as a threat even those institutions are not immune to the infections of greed.
If fellow scientists are not allowed peer review without that bias tainting their findings, then even the most sacred peer reviewed journals, published openly for the purpose of inquiry and debate, become suspect as just another channel for disinformation in the form of unchallenged hypothesis and unsubstantiated "fact".