dyna mo

it's kinda sad to me that you think trying to discuss higher level subjects that have yet to be concluded is trolling. What's worse, is you can easily read this thread and see that I'm the one that's been trying to have an adult convo while people like you come in and hurl insults then tell me I'm trolling.

I've provided scientific view, articles, papers, graphics etc to corroborate my view and not once have you been able to dispute it and I'm the troll.

logic, look into it.

in the meantime, check out this closed-minded egotistical cunt scientist who is certainly trolling and not as smart as suckonthis et al who have concluded the science is settled on the universe.


Another recent book presents the case that Earth is very rare. Alone In the Universe: Why Our Planet Is Unique, by astrophysicist and science writer John Gribbin, gives much support to the idea that Earthlike planets, at least those with technological intelligent aliens on them, are exceedingly rare. His reasons go beyond just the habitability factors a planet must meet. He also shows that there are many contingent events in the Earth's history, the history of life, and in the development of technological civilization, that had to happen to bring us to this point in our existence. These rare chance events, such as the lunar formation event, the Cambrian explosion of animal life forms, and the development of science, all contribute to where we are today. It is far from probable that we and our technological civilization should be here. To expect Earth to be typical in the universe is overly optimistic. As Gribbin writes in the preface, we are the result of "a chain of coincidences that led to the emergence of intelligent life on Earth. And that chain has so many weak links that it may mean that, for all the proliferation of stars and planets in the Universe, as an intelligent species we may be unique."