|
Wouldn’t this already fall under existing copyright laws, i.e. the subject of the content retaining rights to the distribution of the resulting photos, videos, or performances? I understand that the subject of such media generally don’t retain such rights. But why should that force the enforcement of additional laws to account of the shortsightedness of a wealthy and vocal minority? Furthermore, the targets of these laws could likely be outside the jurisdiction of the US anyway. What then?
|