PAR

Hey Mark,
Okay I'll play but keep in mind that I said I do not deny that there is change nor that man played a role.

1) When the Ozone was an issue, the world acted fast, when there is a disaster the world bands together.. So why is it that the major solution to Global warming is a Carbon Tax that basically acts like a for profit stock exchange for carbon credits?
One would thing that a global natural disaster would amount to more than a slow moving tax based solution.

2) Remembering basic science from grade school CO2 is a byproduct of many natural causes..
Man - 29 gigatons of CO2
is tiny compared to the 750 gigatons moving through the carbon cycle each year.
If mankind is only looking at reducing man made CO2 by less than 10% say
2 gigatons what net effect will it really have.

3) CO2 as a by-product of the industrial revaluation has drastically elevated, this is a given...
But so have other things that could and do trap heat.
Keep in mind we are only talking about a a small % of global temperature gain.
Why are we not also looking into all possible heat sources.

Large concrete buildings that trap heat and are know to change weather patters around a city, energy efficient homes use concrete slabs to store heat and as heat sources in the winter. Given their abundance what % if any do they play in the temp increase?
Millions of miles of back top that we drive on each day trap heat to the point you can cook an egg on it.
There are more examples.... but nobody talks about them.. All we hear about is CO2...
If you removed all the CO2 that is man made we still have 750 gigatons moving through the carbon cycle each year....