Originally Posted by dyna mo

I would think that a journalist reporting a story about himself would at least have some facts to support his own claim of bribery, yet there is not one single shred of evidence he presents about being bribed.

on the other hand, I see he just released his new book! coincidence? hardly.

not to mention this guy flip flops historically, first he's a christian hating islam, then an athiest, then an islam hating christians, then anathiest again, now he's wtf who knows.