|
So your contention is that stealing others' graphics, artwork and pictures for your fun and profit is equivalent to a "quotation" or an "Incidental and fortuitous reproduction in a newsreel or broadcast, of a work located in the scene of an event being reported"?
You need a lawyer you fucking idiot. That isn't "research" you did, it's grasping at straws. Do some more "research" and you will find that your defense is the exact same defense put forward by every content thief in almost every lost case. Content thieves always feel that what they do is fair use. It's the one factor they always have in common.
It's like you are taking Copyright Law 101 and now you want to debate 50 phds on the subject.
|