bronco67

When you say "provides Explosive New Evidence"...are you saying that to be humorously sarcastic? Or do you really think this is evidence of anything except a crazy guy who likes to make shit up?

The pictures are up at WeAreChange.org, and while they're great pictures of 9/11 -- they don't really show anything, except if you're one of the nutbags in the reply section who write posts like this:

They reconfirm several points, although I have not yet spotted any new information.
1. As the tower came apart, each of its falling steel elements was leaving behind an extremely thick cloud of dust, because each was disintegrating into powder as it fell. This is better visualized in the slow motion videos.
2. Building 5 had two 12 foot holes punched out, roof to ground, with no debris at their base (not seen here), as if vaporized. These were perfectly round holes, not jagged from falling debris.
3. Building 6 was about 50% gone; at least a 30-40 foot circular cutout, roof to ground, was missing, again with no debris at the base of the hole.
4. The height of the debris pile from the towers was only about 20 feet, except for the peripheral trident assemblies that had formed the lobby walls, which partly survived, leaning against the remnant of building 6.
5. The subway train in the basement beneath the towers was not crushed.
6. Several days later, as the scene of the crime was being destroyed (i.e. the “clean-up”), a fine light gray dust was still rising from the scene, a process that continued for months afterward.
Anyone see anything new in these photos?


WTF makes this idiot an expert on the way debris comes apart? You conspiracy retards see whatever you want in anything.

__________________