Quote:
Originally Posted by xpimp
Thx, i didn t knew that. So i guess paying even 25k for all the package it was a very small loss for pinterest, in case if it failed. The taken risk was worth for such small sum of money for them.
|
In my opinion, sites using a variation of the brand name Pinterest (even if it is just Pin) who are running Pinterest type sites should rightly be deemed to be infringing upon the rights of Pinterest.
Registration of patents is not always necessary for the protection of a unique idea, if Pinterest can show that sites using a Pinterest style interface are infringing upon it's prior art then all sorts of sites could be in trouble.
Intellectual Property law does not always seem fair at first glance, but really if you're trading off the back of the popularity of another site your view of the matter will depend upon whether you are the infringer or the victim.
I am sure that if any of the posters in this thread created something unique and every man and his dog copied that unique idea then you'd probably be wanting to take action too.
However in this case the UDRP complaint was on the basis of a number of factors, it prevailed.