Quote:
Originally Posted by rowan
A 30 year old man talking to a 17 year old girl about shooting pornography could end up in trouble under 'authority' laws or similar, even if that girl is past the age of consent (he's an authority figure, not a similar aged peer). And as JustDaveXxx says any lawmen would immediately blame the dirty pornographer for corrupting a sweet young girl. Why would you even risk it?
Maybe it's because I'm getting old, but even 18 year olds look 'young' to me now. Easy to move on to the next girl who is of legal age.
|
The authority means teachers, polices and so on. And maybe Hugh Hefner. I doubt that any of you would have such authority over a strange girl, that it would be any issue. I would stick up with 18 year old girls and over, but that doesn't change the case. Law is what it is, and we are discussing about the law, right?
Lawmen blaiming is not the same thing as sentence. And if your system is so fucked up that talking to some 17 year old girl (in this case) would lead to jail time, maybe you should vote some other party than either one from the two.