Quote:
Originally Posted by WDF
I think you missed the point.
To assume anyone wants war or the grief that comes with it is either a means to try to provoke a conflict or a momentary lapse of reason on your part.
It is also hard not to admit that the US economy does not improve during times of armed conflict. The Defense Technology Industries in the US supplies many countries around the world.
I never mentioned every day life in the US or any where else improving due to conflict did I? Nope not even an implication of it.
|
I didn't say anything about everybody wanting a war. I just said "if you want war", then making wars is great, as you get what you want. Opposite is that making wars is bad as you don't want wars. If you don't yet understand, I say "make", like make cars, as you can focus resources between different things, like making tanks or cars. For example some Soviet factories had two assembly lines, one for tractors and one for tanks. It was easy to alter what they made. Making tanks would be making war in my "metaphor" (I also meant real wars).
About the economy. As far as I know US government is the biggest client for your defence industry, others are just merely peanuts. Your economy boosts during war because of "extending credit", but you can do it for whatever reason you choose to, not just for war, and the result for the economy is the same.. well not actually the same.. depends about the "trickle effect".
You missed my point. Economy is just numbers when you look GDP.