View Single Post
Old 08-02-2014, 01:30 PM  
aka123
Confirmed User
 
aka123's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: 64 00 N, 26 00 E
Posts: 4,450
Quote:
Originally Posted by Relentless View Post
Many programs earn more than that per acquisition. They aren't basing their payouts on the value of a join, they are basing their payouts on the total value per acquisition. Exactly the same way you should be basing your traffic decisions on total Net $/click (not just the direct payout per pay period). If someone sends you traffic back, provides you other sources of income or brings you new connections worth money that ought to all be factored into the NET $/click equation.
Having said that (and what I said), there is one scenario in where paysite might pay more money for PPS, than they directly earn from that. Having your brand/ site known is very important part of business. In affiliate model initial exposure is free, as affiliates are only paid for customers, those come through their links and order within certain time frame/ session. Like affiliates do calculate the total value, so does paysites. Exposure, that materialises through brand recognition, type in traffic and google traffic, does produce value as well.

I have done basic advertising in magazines and newspapers (mainstream). You pay x-sum for the exposure. You can do it in affiliate model too.

Last edited by aka123; 08-02-2014 at 01:34 PM..
aka123 is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote