Quote:
Originally Posted by Rochard
Something is not right with that site....
They discovered seven footprints in the corridor between Meredith's bedroom where she was murdered and Amanda Knox's bedroom. No similar footprints were discovered anywhere else in the cottage. The three footprints in Knox's room yielded Knox's genetic profile and one of the footprints in the hallway contained both Amanda and Meredith's DNA.
Later on the same page says:
The footprints were also limited to the part of the corridor between Meredith and Amanda's room and were not found anywhere else in the cottage.
HUH?
On top of that, it seems these foot prints might not be blood at all.
http://www.injusticeinperugia.org/footprints-01.html
The footprints were never proven to be made in blood. The footprints were detected with luminol. As mentioned above, the stains were tested with tetramethylbenzidine which is extremely sensitive for blood. All of the stains detected with luminol tested negative for blood.
So now we aren't sure where the footprints are, and then when they tested them for blood they didn't find any?
Sorry, you got nothing. There is no evidence proving she did anything here. |
You are hopelessly locked into trying to explaining away hard evidence with theories that defy common sense.
Those prints were cleaned up with bleach; but bleach doesn't remove all the properties of blood so the print is still lighting up even if you can't find a blood cell.
The footprints are blood by any reasonable analysis.
You are in a "belief state", this is your God and I can't make you see that it doesn't exist.
.