07-31-2014, 04:13 PM
|
|
|
Making PHP work
Industry Role:
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: 🌎🌅🌈🌇
Posts: 20,254
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rochard
I don't know who it belongs to but it doesn't seem to belong to Amanda Knox. None of the footprints tested positive for her DNA. If they were her foot prints, why weren't they in her room?
Other than the fact that Knox lived with the murder victim, there not one shred of evidence that leads me to believe she had anything to do with it.
|
http://themurderofmeredithkercher.com/Luminol_Traces
Quote:
|
On December 18, 2007 Deputy Commissioner Maurizio Arnone and Chief Inspector Claudio Ippolito went to the cottage to spray luminol on certain areas and photograph any traces of blood that the luminol might reveal.[1] The areas that were to be covered included the kitchen-living room, the bedrooms of Amanda Knox and Filomena Romanelli, and the large bathroom.[2] They discovered seven footprints in the corridor between Meredith's bedroom where she was murdered and Amanda Knox's bedroom. No similar footprints were discovered anywhere else in the cottage. [3] The three footprints in Knox's room yielded Knox's genetic profile and one of the footprints in the hallway contained both Amanda and Meredith's DNA.[4]
|
 |
|
|