Quote:
Originally Posted by femdomdestiny
I've gave you "western "source so you can't blame it on politics and propaganda. Everything else is your personal opinion, that is not backing official categorazation
Estonia? Lol...NATO memeber with population of 1.3 millions people.
What are you talking about? All what I was telling from the beginning is that army without nukes can be considered regional power (maximum) and not a serious army. I've asked from you to give me list of countries (with nukes) that someone tried to conquer. You failed to do so. That was just example of what I ve said. that is all.
Like everything said in your previous posts, this is also not true and it is twisting of real situation.
[I]The NATO bombing campaign has remained controversial, as it did not gain the approval of the UN Security Council.[61]
|
It's my personal opinion (the war), so what? And why you keep talking about those nukes? To what does that relate? Do I start talking about salad dressings? And if no one tries to conquer nuke countries, why you are so concerned about NATO? You have nukes in Russia, right?
About the Yugoslavia bombings, as far it goes with Wikipedia, there even wasn't Germans much involved. Besides the bombing, the peace keeping operations had UN approval.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NATO_bombing_of_Yugoslavia