Quote:
Originally Posted by femdomdestiny
So if you have article in front of you, you are reading only first sentence, or just one that you like? Definition is several sentences long and all of them are equally important.
I've pasted you link above where it is officially named Crimean Crysis, and not Crimean war.
How do you explain that, especially coming from "western" source?
Who and when tried to conquer country with nukes? Give me example and compare it how many countries without nukes were attacked in last several decades (some with three times bigger army then German now).Show us.
Ok, then explain why Germany needed protection back in 1999 so it went almost 1000 km to bomb?
Not for me, I've responded to every single thing you tried to show in different light and yet I didn't gate answer to all those questions above sent to you.
|
About the "Crimean crisis". Haven't you heard about politics? As there are no formal war declaration it would be politically kinda hard to call it as a war. Even the president of Estonia said about current developments in Ukraine that "Normally this would be called as war." Russia hides in the shadows of uncertainty.
And what that nuke issue got's to do with what I just said? Nothing. I said that there are nukes all over the world and those presence is not act of war. Using them against someone is.
And I am through with this issue about Germany. Think whatever you want about the Yugoslavian campaign, that was backed by UN, where also Russia had it's vote about it, and it didn't vote against the campaign.