Quote:
Originally Posted by mopek1
Why are you so sure the models they use are faulty?
And why are you so sure that the paleoclimatologists are right?
|
As I understand it (I first heard this from a scientist who was a guest on Bill Maher's show on HBO)...the Earth is adapting in several ways (as it always has). The way I've been talking about is the fact that the ocean is now absorbing CO2 at a higher rate.
That...all by itself makes the data that global warming scientists created their computer models and projections on...WRONG.
Another tidbit from the ocean...plankton are apparently taking care of a big amount of CO2 as well.
There's several other smaller things happening too.
But obviously if you thought that there was going to be "X" amount of CO2...and nature has changed that by a pretty measurable percentage...then all of the computer models will be thrown off.
It's pretty interesting and of course makes perfect sense.
As they say: G.I.G.O. "Garbage In, Garbage Out"
And no, I don't mean that the original data was really "garbage". But it is wrong.
I believe this is the same thing that has made all the climate projections over the last 50 years keep coming out wrong.
The Earth is fluid. And it changes. The data they use is static and can't compensate for the Earth adapting.
I think that's also the point of the emails. The scientists who are funded by companies with major interest in there BEING global warming can't risk losing their money.
The emails suggest that they might not be shouting to the world about the changes that the new data makes to the OLD computer models from over a decade ago.